Arachnids (Aranei, Opiliones) from grass stand and forest litter in the Urals, Russia

説明

データ レコード

この sampling event リソース内のデータは、1 つまたは複数のデータ テーブルとして生物多様性データを共有するための標準化された形式であるダーウィン コア アーカイブ (DwC-A) として公開されています。 コア データ テーブルには、1,351 レコードが含まれています。

拡張データ テーブルは1 件存在しています。拡張レコードは、コアのレコードについての追加情報を提供するものです。 各拡張データ テーブル内のレコード数を以下に示します。

この IPT はデータをアーカイブし、データ リポジトリとして機能します。データとリソースのメタデータは、 ダウンロード セクションからダウンロードできます。 バージョン テーブルから公開可能な他のバージョンを閲覧でき、リソースに加えられた変更を知ることができます。

バージョン

次の表は、公にアクセス可能な公開バージョンのリソースのみ表示しています。

引用方法

研究者はこの研究内容を以下のように引用する必要があります。:

Nesterkov A, Zolotarev M, Belskaya E, Tuneva T (2021): Arachnids (Aranei, Opiliones) from grass stand and forest litter in the Urals, Russia. v1.13. Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology (IPAE). Dataset/Samplingevent. http://gbif.ru:8080/ipt/resource?r=arachnids_ural&v=1.13

権利

研究者は権利に関する下記ステートメントを尊重する必要があります。:

パブリッシャーとライセンス保持者権利者は Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology (IPAE)。 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY 4.0) License.

GBIF登録

このリソースをはGBIF と登録されており GBIF UUID: e170dbd1-a67f-4514-841c-5296b290ca90が割り当てられています。   Participant Node Managers Committee によって承認されたデータ パブリッシャーとして GBIF に登録されているInstitute of Plant and Animal Ecology (IPAE) が、このリソースをパブリッシュしました。

キーワード

Occurrence; arachnida; aranei; opiliones; diversity; abundance; sex; life stage; Samplingevent

連絡先

地理的範囲

The studied areas are located in the southern taiga zone of the Central and Southern Urals. The polygon at the Central Urals is located 60–70 km westbound from Yekaterinburg in primary spruce-fir and secondary aspen-birch forests with secondary upland meadows created through clear-cutting. At the Southern Urals two polygons are located in 10 and 60 km NE from Miass, in pine-birch forest.

生物分類学的範囲

The dataset contains all of the information obtained during the sampling for the Arachnida class (including Aranei and Opiliones orders). General taxonomic coverage is 1 phylum, 2 orders, 23 families, 115 genera, 178 species.

プロジェクトデータ

説明がありません

プロジェクトに携わる要員:

収集方法

1. Sampling of meadow grass stand invertebrates with biocenometer was carried out no closer than 10 m from the forest edge. The points for installing the biocenometer were chosen randomly but at intervals of no less than 5 m. The sampling procedure was carried out from 9:00 to 21:00 local time. The sampling plots were examined on the same day. Morning-, midday-, and evening-time-collected samples were available for each investigated plot. Sampling was timed to the second half of every summer month (10 samples per plot) from 2006 to 2008. 2. Sampling of forest litter invertebrates was conducted with two general schemes. Line-designed scheme includes 5 pitfall traps per trapping line, with a spacing of 3 m, and 3 lines per sampling plot (a total of 8 plots). Matrix-designed scheme includes 7×7 matrix of pitfall traps with 10 m spacing on a single sampling plot. Locations of every trap were permanent throughout the study. Traps were emptied once per 3 to 6 days. Sampling was conducted in two-time sets – May–June and August–September (which is timed to the peak abundance of spring-summer and summer-autumn species) in 2004, 2009 and 2013 (for line-designed trapping) and in 2005 and 2018 (for matrix-designed trapping).

Method step description:

1. 1. Sampling of grass stand invertebrates was carried out at 3 permanent free-form sampling plots (approximately 2500 m² in size) that were positioned at a distance of 100–300 m from each other in the lower parts of the secondary upland meadows created through forest clear-cutting more than 60 years ago. Sampling was timed to the second half of every summer month from 2006 to 2008. Sampling was performed by using a modified biocenometer consisting of a bottom (metal frame 50×50 cm) hermetically connected to a cube-shaped covering of a dense cloth. One of the lateral sides of covering was sewn from nylon gauze (mesh diameter 0.25 mm) and used as a light screen to attract invertebrates with positive photokinesis. The opposite-to-screen side of covering contains an aperture with an inlet valve for the researcher. Invertebrates were collected with a suction sampler from a light screen and inner surfaces of biocenometer until the new targets stopped appearing. All the plants that got inside were also processed with a suction sampler (to gather invertebrates), cut with scissors at ground level and taken away for a manual check for hidden invertebrates. Then the biocenometer was turned over and its inner surface and seams were examined, as well as the soil surface and bases of plant stems. All detected invertebrates were devitalized by ethyl acetate and preserved in 70% alcohol. The sampling procedure was carried out from 9:00 to 21:00 local time. All three sampling plots were examined on the same day. Morning-, midday-, and evening-time-collected samples were available for each investigated plot. The points for installing the biocenometer were chosen randomly but at intervals of no less than 5 m. 10 samples per plot were taken in each summer month.
2. 2. Pitfall trapping was carried out in biotopes most typical for the studied areas: primary spruce-fir forest, secondary aspen-birch forest and pine-birch forest. Sampling plots were founded in sites with the lowest degree of degradation of woody vegetation. Barber’s traps were used (plastic glasses, diameter 8.5 cm, 3% acetic acid solution as a fixative) in line–designed and matrix–designed schemes. Line-designed scheme (5 traps per line with 3 m spacing between traps, 3 lines per sampling plot no closer than 100 m from each other, 8 plots (each approximately 2400 m² in size) in total were examined both in spruce-fir (3 plots) and aspen-birch (5 plots) forests; matrix-designed (7×7 matrix of traps with 10 m spacing) on a single square-form sampling plot (3 600 m²) in a spruce-fir forest. All plots and locations of every trap were permanent throughout the study. Sampling was conducted in two-time sets – May–June and August– September (which is timed to the peak abundance of spring-summer and summer-autumn species) in 2004, 2009 and 2013 (for line-designed trapping) and in 2005 and 2018 (for matrix-designed trapping). The traps were emptied once per 3 to 6 days; all collected invertebrates were preserved in 70% alcohol.
3. 3. Identification was carried out in laboratory using (Nentwig et al., 2019) for spiders, and identification keys of (Farzalieva, Esyunin, 1999) for harvestmen, as well as some additional monographs.

コレクションデータ

書誌情報の引用

1. Farzalieva G, Esyunin S (1999) The harvestman fauna of the Urals, Russia, with а key to the Ural species (Arachnida: Opiliones) // Arthropoda selecta. v8. P. 183–199
2. Nentwig W, Blick T, Bosmans R, Gloor D, Hänggi A, Kropf C (2019) . Version 04.2019. Online at https://www.araneae.nmbe.ch, accessed on 01.04.2019. doi: 10.24436/1
3. World Spider Catalog (2020). World Spider Catalog. Version 21.0. Natural History Museum Bern, online at http://wsc.nmbe.ch, accessed on 12.04.2020. doi: 10.24436/2
4. Jong Y et al. (2014) Fauna Europaea – all European animal species on the web. Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e4034. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e4034
5. Nesterkov A, Zolotarev M, Belskaya E, Tuneva T (2020) Arachnids (Araneae, Opiliones) from grass stand and forest litter in the Urals, Russia. Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e55242. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e55242

追加のメタデータ